Then turn to China. The situation is fairly different; after all, it only has been three or four decades since we made full contact with these western novels. Owing to the situation of China today, a stage filled with rapid development both in economy and culture, the discussion about the two novels is still a preference for Chinese scholars. For Pride and Prejudice, since there is an oft-recounted paragraph going at the very beginning of novel that “IT IS A TRUTH universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife”, people prefer to make comparisons among four main relationships in the novel. Shao Weimin, holds that the love between Jane Bennet and Charles Bingley is a kind of fairy tale and between Elizabeth and Darcy, a kind of idol drama, and both of them are the consorts with happiness. The marriages between Charlotte and Collins, and Lydia and Wickham are not as good as the former two. Charlotte’s marriage is too secular, tied with too much consideration of money and status factors and Lydia’s is just a blind pursuit of beauty and passion, lacking morality (2016). By studying Austen’s life and casual marriage, An an concludes that love is the core of marriage and without it, marriage will be a disaster sooner or later (2007). As far as Wuthering Heights, when it comes to the heroine, researchers are more willing to analyze how Catherine changes to a tragic role as we all know that Wuthering Heights is much darker than Pride and Prejudice. Deng Zhihui, from Sun Yat-sen University, has published a paper analyzing Catherine’s tragic feminism in detail, pointing out that under patriarchy, with its authoritative education of ideas, moral principles and values, women have lost their identity (2006). 

As for comparable essays between Pride and Prejudice and Wuthering Heights, in Bi Yuhong’s Contrast between Pride and Prejudice and Wuthering Heights – Analysis of marriage values between Jane Austen and Emily Brontë (2016:5), the main difference between Jane Austen and Emily Brontë is that Austen thinks that love is important but an economic foundation is also another important guarantee of marriage while Brontë thinks love has nothing to do with others but in reality the gap of pedigree cannot be ignored.

上一篇:体验营销对消费者购买意愿的影响以小米为例
下一篇:没有了

对《蝇王》中人性转变的分析

加缪荒诞哲学视角下《动物园的故事》解读

论《别让我走》中角色塑造对小说主题的影响

《了不起的盖茨比》中颜...

经济伦理视阈下的《傲慢与偏见》

德语论文浅析《格林童话》中的公主形象

精神危机的救赎《红字》的生态批评研究

形状记忆合金连接质量研究

新疆特色文化发展的障碍与对策

我国公务员职业道德建设的问题及对策

小學语文情境化課堂识字...

偏振光的动态接收和识别

狮子座女生今日运势查询...

泰州市农技推广中农户参与行为研究

黄金管制政策文献综述和参考文献

SolidWorks30mm3连发自动炮炮身设计

幼儿艺术兴趣班培训存在的问题及策略