毕业论文

打赏
当前位置: 毕业论文 > 法学论文 >

涉外消费者合同的冲突规范立法思考

时间:2025-07-10 22:45来源:100234
国际私法已由传统单一的冲突主义(即形式主义)逐渐向追求实质正义与形式正义的现代价值平衡转变。而我国《法律适用法》第42条规定的出现本身就是一大法治进步

摘    要:我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第42条规定是建国后首次从冲突法角度对涉外消费者合同法律选择适用机制提出的唯一单独适用依据,其区别于一般涉外民事合同法律适用规则,在秉承国际私法主权原则与平等互利原则的同时,进一步汇聚了对处于社会弱势地位的消费者群体之人权保障精神。随着我国市场经济在“互联网+”指导战略的创新推动下,经济发展模式正向多样化、全球化的方向发展。基于此,扩大《法律适用法》第42条的解释范围不仅顺应国际发展潮流,也符合我国经济贸易利益的需要。文章试图通过对国内现行法的分析,比较欧美国家相关法律适用的理论与实践,进一步探讨涉外消费者合同法律适用在我国的有效应对。

Abstract

The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People's Republic of China Article 42 is the only proper law basis used to deal with foreign-related consumer contracts after the founding of China from the perspective of the conflict law, and it differs from the applicable law rules of general foreign-related civil contracts. Article 42 upholds the principles of sovereignty and equality and mutual benefits,  foucusing more on protecting the human right of those consumers who are staying in weak social position. 

Currently, innovatively driven by the Internet Plus, our socialist economic entities are moving toward persification and globalization of e-commerce, hence, the expansion on the scope of interpretation of The Law of the Application Article 42 is inevitable in order to go with the tide of world development and meet the needs of China's economic and trade interests.

This article is going to further discuss the effective way of new foreign-related consumer contract in China to confront it, by analyzing the current domestic law and comparing the theory and practice of the foreign-related consumer contract conflict norms and application of law among several countries in America and Europe.

关键词:涉外消费者合同; 法律适用; 正义; 意思自治原则; 最密切联系原则

Keywords: foreign consumer contract; application of law; justice; the principle of parties’ autonomy; the doctrine of the most significant relationship

目    录

引言 4

一、涉外消费者合同的法概念与法理基础辨析 4

(一)涉外消费者合同的内涵界定 4

1、消费者合同的内涵 4

2、涉外消费者合同界定及特殊性 4

(二)涉外消费者合同冲突规范与法律适用的立法现状 5

(三)法律适用的法哲学基础与价值取向分析 6

1、弱者利益保护理论 6

2、正义价值论的导向 6

二、域外涉外消费者合同冲突规范之考量 7

(一)各国立法体例 7

1、美国 7

2、瑞士 8

3、欧盟 8

4、各代表模式引申出的法系比较 8

(二)各国规定间的法律冲突 9

1、正义价值观不同 9

2、国内消费者政策不同 9

3、意思自治原则的理解程度不同 涉外消费者合同的冲突规范立法思考:http://www.chuibin.com/faxue/lunwen_205851.html

------分隔线----------------------------
推荐内容